the following is a responce to a post on a mitochondrial desease forum that I thought you all would find interesting:
" Great information by reputable sources! Wow! As a doctor who has prescribed
a lot of stains, reading these was very enlightening, actually I have to admit a
bit shocking. How can it be that this info. Is not getting out there???? Do
you know that docs are often given financial incentives to get cholesterol
levels down really low? I used to receive a monthly scorecard with one of the
"quality" indicators being how many of my diabetic patients had their LDL
cholesterol down to less than 100? This was part of how my bonus was
calculated. Obviously makes no sense. Too many administrators with nothing
better to do! The more I think about it, the more wrong it seems. I am not
practicing right now, but I am going to think about this more and consider
trying to impress this information on my colleagues. I don't think statins
should be withdrawn from the market, but we need to reevaluate why and to whom
we are prescribing them. "Do no harm.""
this was my post that got this responce:
> > OH yes
> >
> > see here:
> > "http://www.spacedoc.com/
> > left side list of menues select statin drugs, then statin side effects, then
mitochondria. there are several articles.
> >
> > and here:
> >
> > Statin Adverse Effects: A Review of the Literature and Evidence for a
Mitochondrial Mechanism
> >
> > "*http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2849981/
> >
> > well clearly some are more suseptable but there is also a much higher
incidence of adverse effects than the drug companies would have you believe just
as the percentage of people who benifit from statins is much lower and they only
benifit from the anti-inflamatory effect of statins..not from lowering
cholesterol.
> >
> > see here:
> >
> >" *http://www.mayoclinic.org/medicalprofs/statin-intolerance-clinic.html
> >
> > and here:
> >
> >
"*http://mayoresearch.mayo.edu/mayo/research/ker_unit/upload/StatinDecAid_AVG_Mayo\
.pdf
> >
> > the drug companies avertise the "relative risk" reduction which in the
example shown would be 20% while only 2% benifit actually!
> >
> > as for the rhabdo...been there done that, treated myself with fluids and
electrolytes which I continue to this day.
> >
> > David
David