by Dee » Sat Aug 19, 2006 12:15 am
Harley, great letter!
Just my 2 cents worth, but I would leave out the "is cholesterol good, bad, or indifferent" argument, since many of those the letter will be directed to will be of the mindset that cholesterol is bad and needs to be lowered. These readers probably would not even care one iota that there are alternative methods of lowering it if need be. They will not care that we NEED cholesterol. The argument will be lost on them and may distract them from the important critical information about the scope of statin damage.
SO...just assume, from the viewpoint of the intended recipients, that cholesterol IS the boogeyman. Statins are STILL a criminally negligent and dangerous solution to the problem, and the fact that they are still being widely prescribed is inexcusable. That is the point we need to emphasize.
The studies backing up the adverse effects that statins are causing would be a critical addition to validate our complaints and experiences.
Harley, I LOVE the first sentence of your letter! Everytime I see one of those commercials, I utter words I can not repeat here:) Dee
[quote="harley2ride"]Okay,
Here is a start/draft for a letter. Please reply by quoting this post, and add anything helpful, including links I may have missed. I'm still waiting on some info from other sources to add to this ie: info from Dr. Phillips at Scripps, and a copy of a letter he sent me concerning his clinical trial results showing dangers of statins.
To whom it may concern,
There are many of us out here, who cringe every time we see one of the Statin drug commercials on television, or in printed ads. These ads promote the safety of Crestor, Vytorin, Lipitor, Zocor, Pravachol, Mevacor, Lescol, Advicor, and Zetia. In these commercials and ads, they highly praise the effectiveness of their drugs, and then at the end with a few short and down played words, they mention the “RAREâ€